<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
    <title>I protest.</title>
    <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</link>
    <description>I&#8217;m doing my part, however small, to fight the fearmongering, hatred and lies of so-called &#8220;conservatives&#8221; such as Bush, Cheney and the rest.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>frank@exit.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008 Frank Mayhar</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-06-29T00:41:34-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.1" />
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:frank@exit.com"/>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>


    <item>
      <title>Where are you, Joanna Zhang?</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000444.html</link>
      <description>I made a mistake some years ago, and I lost a friend. It&#8217;s a real long shot, but if you see this, call me. You know my number&#8230;.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">444@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a mistake some years ago, and I lost a friend.  It&#8217;s a real long shot, but if you see this, call me.  You know my number.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Personal</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-29T00:41:34-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Here&apos;s one for the Republicans.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000431.html</link>
      <description>Today, CNN online had this story: Authorities puzzled about mother in deaths of children left in hot car - CNN.com. It&#8217;s about a poor single mother who left her children in her car while she worked a double shift. They&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">431@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, CNN online had this story:  <a title="Authorities puzzled about mother in deaths of children left in hot car - CNN.com" href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/08/04/toddlers.carolina.ap/index.html">Authorities puzzled about mother in deaths of children left in hot car - CNN.com</a>.  It&#8217;s about a poor single mother who left her children in her car while she worked a double shift.  They both died.  &#8220;Terrible mother,&#8221; you think, right?  &#8220;Should have known better.&#8221;  &#8220;Deserves to go to jail for child abuse,&#8221; right?</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s what the article has to say about it:</p>

<blockquote>Sametta Heyward was in a bind. The single mother was scheduled to start a double shift at 3 p.m., and her baby sitter had just canceled.

<p>&#8220;She was either told to come to work or be fired, or she was afraid to call in sick &#8212; one of those things,&#8221; said police Lt. Michael Fowler.</p>

<p>She made it to her job at a county-run group home July 29, a typically warm summer day. After eight hours, she called a supervisor and said she had to leave because of child-care issues.</p>

<p>According to her employer, she didn&#8217;t tell the supervisor or a co-worker that for all that time, she had left her 1-year-old daughter and 4-year-old son in her Chevy Cavalier hatchback, parked on a residential street.</p>

<p>She had left Triniti and Shawn with battery-powered fans, food and drinks, but it was not nearly enough to combat the sweltering conditions inside. She later told relatives that when she got to the car at 11:30 p.m., the children were unconscious and had weak pulses.</p>

<p>A day later, police found her at her apartment wailing, &#8220;Oh, my babies!&#8221;</blockquote></p>

<p>What would have happened had there been free or cheap subsidized public daycare?</p>

<p>At least the Republicans will be happy: there are two fewer poor children in South Carolina, and a poor, single mother who will be going to jail.  Out of sight, out of mind.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Government</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-08-05T10:36:29-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Yep.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000428.html</link>
      <description>It is indeed the truth&#8230;.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">428@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed the <a href="http://scq.ubc.ca/?p=677">truth</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Sociology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-01-24T12:06:33-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>And the janitors win.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000426.html</link>
      <description>It looks like despite the best efforts of the Houston Police Department, the new union scored a contract. -On the heels of a string of victories in Miami, Los Angeles and Boston that have resulted in dramatic gains for families,&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">426@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like despite the best efforts of the Houston Police Department, the new union <a title="Houston Janitors - Janitors’ Victory in Houston 11/20/2006" href="http://www.houstonjanitors.org/janitors-victory-11202006/">scored a contract</a>.</p>

<blockquote>-On the heels of a string of victories in Miami, Los Angeles and Boston that have resulted in dramatic gains for families, more than 5,300 janitors in Houston won higher wages, more hours, and health insurance in their first city-wide union contract. The contract will lift hundreds of janitors out of poverty, more than doubling their income within 24 months and guaranteeing secure affordable health care.</blockquote>

<p>Bravo.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Human Rights</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-11-22T22:28:18-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Fuck Houston.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000425.html</link>
      <description>Via Majikthise : Houston janitors brutalized in custody, Anna Denise Sol&#237;s&#8217; story. Among the worst of it: One of the protesters had a fractured wrist from the horses. She had a cast on and when she would fall asleep the&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">425@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a title="Majikthise : Houston janitors brutalized in custody" href="http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2006/11/houston_janitor.html">Majikthise : Houston janitors brutalized in custody</a>, <a title="Houston Janitors - Anna Denise Sol&#237;s" href="http://www.houstonjanitors.org/anna-denise-solis/">Anna Denise Sol&#237;s&#8217; story</a>.</p>

<p>Among the worst of it:</p>

<blockquote>One of the protesters had a fractured wrist from the horses. She had a cast on and when she would fall asleep the guard would kick the cast to wake her up. She was in a lot of pain.
&hellip;
The guards would tell us: &#8216;This is what you get for protesting.&#8217;
&hellip;
One of the guards called us &#8216;whores&#8217; and if we talked back, we didn&#8217;t get any lunch.</blockquote>

<p>Of course, those cops will get off scot-free.  They were &#8220;just following orders&#8221; like good little brownshirts.</p>

<p>Fascism is alive and well and living in Houston.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Civil Rights</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-11-18T23:03:05-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>&quot;Tar Baby.&quot;</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000422.html</link>
      <description>What David Zink said. I&#8217;ll continue to use the phrase in its appropriate sense, thankyouverymuch, and those idiots who claim that it&#8217;s &#8220;racist&#8221; can go fuck themselves. It ain&#8217;t. (I may not like Tony Snow very much, but apparently he&#8217;s&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">422@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What <a title="Ceejbot :: No monopoly on stupid" href="http://snippy.ceejbot.com/wiki/show/start/2006/05/19/001">David Zink said</a>.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll continue to use the phrase in its appropriate sense, thankyouverymuch, and those idiots who claim that it&#8217;s &#8220;racist&#8221; can go fuck themselves.  It ain&#8217;t.</p>

<p>(I may not like Tony Snow very much, but apparently he&#8217;s slightly more literate than those who have been so hysterical over his use of the phrase.)</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-05-19T17:13:43-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>No surprise there...</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000421.html</link>
      <description></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">421@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<center><a href="http://www.nerdtests.com/ft_nq.php?im"><img src="http://www.nerdtests.com/images/ft/nq.php?val=1786" alt="I am nerdier than 95% of all people. Are you nerdier? Click here to find out!"></a></center>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Personal</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-04-08T18:01:30-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>A bortion.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000420.html</link>
      <description>I have a Google News alert for the words &#8220;botched abortion,&#8221; as I wait for the current climate to have its inevitable effect of death and disfigurement of women. Today it triggered on an op-ed piece in the Arizona Star&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">420@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Google News alert for the words &#8220;botched abortion,&#8221; as I wait for the current climate to have its inevitable effect of death and disfigurement of women.  Today it triggered on an op-ed piece in the Arizona Star by one Cynthia Duell, &#8220;<a title="Emotion shouldn't drive decision to abort" href="http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/122938">Emotion shouldn&#8217;t drive decision to abort</a>.&#8221;</p>

<p>She&#8217;s, um, anti-abortion.</p>

<p>So I decided to reply with a letter to the editor, CC&#8217;d directly to her, <a href="mailto:gcombsc@comcast.net">gcombsc@comcast.net</a>.  For what it&#8217;s worth, here it is in its entirety:</p>

<blockquote><p>This is a response to your recent opinion piece by Cynthia Duell; I am also sending a copy directly to her.</p>
<p>Ms. Duell, while I appreciate and agree with your assertion that one should make decisions such as those relating to abortion rationally, the fact remains that pregnancy brings with it emotion.  Whether those feelings are positive or negative depends entirely upon the individuals involved and their circumstances.  An unwanted pregnancy, whether due to failure of birth control (even the Pill isn&#8217;t completely reliable) or to simple carelessness, is going to bring with it extremely strong feelings.  Those feelings will influence the decision, no matter what you or I may say.</p>
<p>Further, the decision to have an abortion can indeed be a perfectly rational one.  You may assert that such an act is &#8220;a transgression of common morality and common sense&#8221; but that is, I&#8217;m afraid, your opinion only.  There are many who find that act to be the least bad of a number of terrible alternatives.</p>
<p>Make no mistake, the decision to have an abortion is a weighty one and one that no one enters into lightly, no matter who might claim otherwise.  Unfortunately, in many cases it is is, as I said, the least bad of the possible choices.</p>
<p>Personally, I do not pretend to know how someone else may choose.  My morality isn&#8217;t yours and my choices are not yours.  I will not try to make your choices for you and I expect the same from you.  The choice to have an abortion is in fact one that is too important to be left to politicians, judges and the clergy.  It is such an important and momentous decision that it can only be made by the woman involved.</p>
<p>Finally, I think that you grossly overstate the case when you refer to potential complications of abortion.  Might I also point out that all of these are in fact also potential complications of miscarriage, which happens without a doctor involved, and many are complications of pregnancy itself!  Also, when you claim that statistics of complications related to abortion are &#8220;without a doubt&#8221; incomplete, because &#8220;abortion doctors&#8221; underreport those complications, I must demand that you back up your assertion with proof.  I believe that this is only your opinion, which you are stating as if it is fact.</p>
<p>Thank you for your attention.</p>
<p>Yours,<br />
Frank Mayhar<br />
Redondo Beach, California</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Civil Rights</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-04-04T20:57:51-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Just turn your back.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000419.html</link>
      <description>On Friday I took my wife to her naturalization ceremony in downtown Los Angeles. There were some 4000+ people being naturalized just in that session, with another 4000+ having been naturalized in the morning session. It was an exciting event&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">419@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday I took my wife to her naturalization ceremony in downtown Los Angeles.  There were some 4000+ people being naturalized just in that session, with another 4000+ having been naturalized in the morning session.  It was an exciting event for those who were becoming new citizens, but more than a little tedious for someone with little patience for pomp, circumstance and long demonstrations of patriotism.  It was basically a rah-rah moment for the United States government as far as I was concerned.  That was okay, though, since I&#8217;m sure most of those being naturalized were feeling pretty &#8220;rah-rah&#8221; just about then.</p>

<p>It only got painful at the end.  True to the demonstrations of &#8220;patriotism,&#8221; they took time for a videotaped speech by Bush.  (Not that he would lower himself to actually <i>attend</i> one of these things, but whatever.)</p>

<p>If you&#8217;ve read any of my writing here, you&#8217;ll know that I find Bush vile, despicable, venal, selfish, smallminded, bigoted and a fool.  On a good day.  So I was less than thrilled to have to watch his smarmy, insincere face mouth platitudes to a video camera.  Without really consciously thinking about it, I just turned my back.  I stayed exactly where I was, I just turned my back.  As I stood there with his voice droning on, I realized that what I had done was exactly the right answer to Bush, to his cronies and to the Republicans as a whole.  They only deserve our contempt, so show it.  When they speak, don&#8217;t protest, don&#8217;t carry signs, don&#8217;t say a word.  Just stand up and turn your back.</p>

<p>Why should we applaud the scum that are fucking our country?  I would love to see the Democrats in the House and Senate just quietly stand and turn their backs every time a Republican spoke.  It&#8217;s quiet, it&#8217;s dignified and it sends an unavoidable message, that the person speaking is not worth our attention.</p>

<p>When I turned my back on Bush on Friday, almost no one noticed and the few that did just looked confused.  When more do so, though, it will be noticed.  And if even one Senator were to turn her back on Frist or Cheney while they were speaking, it would send a message that they couldn&#8217;t ignore.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-02-05T16:32:24-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Religious folly.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000418.html</link>
      <description>Shakespeare&#8217;s Sister wants to know if there&#8217;s a good reason for US to side with the reactionaries rather than the defenders of free speech? Um, no, there isn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s very damned simple: Islamic fundamentalists have gotten their panties in a&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">418@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Shakespeare's Sister" href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2006/02/discussion-thread-cartoon-outrage.html">Shakespeare&#8217;s Sister</a> wants to know if there&#8217;s</p>

<blockquote>a good reason for US to side with the reactionaries rather than the defenders of free speech?</blockquote>

<p>Um, no, there isn&#8217;t.  It&#8217;s very damned simple:  Islamic fundamentalists have gotten their panties in a twist over a few cartoons that they should have simply ignored.  They&#8217;ve whipped their public into a frenzy, as if those cartoons are somehow &#8220;attacking&#8221; Islam.  Said fundamentalists are vile, as is the burning of embassies in Syria and Lebanon.</p>

<p>The appeasement by the <i>Christian</i> fundamentalists of the United States is equally vile.  It&#8217;s of course to be expected, as these fundamentalists desire the same ability, to provoke riots in order to destroy those to whom they are opposed (that is, rational folks like myself, Shakespeare&#8217;s Sister and all the others).  One fundamentalist is pretty much exactly like any other, Islamic, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, or whatever.</p>

<p>They&#8217;re all fucking insane and insanely self-absorbed, to the point that they can&#8217;t see reality for their delusions.</p>

<p>CNN online has a poll just now asking which is more important, &#8220;respect for religious beliefs&#8221; or freedom of expression.  Thirty percent of the respondents seem to think that you shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to express yourself if such an expression would show &#8220;disrespect&#8221; for religious beliefs.</p>

<p>Personally, I respect no religious belief, so I guess these idiots would want me to just shut up entirely.</p>

<p><b>Not.  Fucking.  Likely.</b></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Religion</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-02-05T10:22:26-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Then is now.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000417.html</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Via Feministe, a blast from the present, abortion in the USA circa 2006: Our Word. Perhaps the most poignant bit: &hellip; Only Saturday I took a call from a young woman who has been pregnant for 16 weeks, one week&#8230;]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">417@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a title="Feministe" href="http://feministe.us/blog/">Feministe</a>, a blast from the present, abortion in the USA circa 2006:  <a title="God Forbid" href="http://ourword.org/node/843#comment-3369?PHPSESSID=9d52cf303c1402abca5400b37a7d2a9a">Our Word</a>.  Perhaps the most poignant bit:</p>

<blockquote>&hellip; Only Saturday I took a call from a young woman who has been pregnant for 16 weeks, one week too many for a woman who wants to have an abortion in a Texas clinic. I explained that restriction, and offered her the only help I could: referrals to three ambulatory surgical centers in a state the size of France. She asked, &#8220;How much will it cost, about $700?&#8221; I told her that the cost in any of the ASCs to which I could refer her would be about twice that much. And then she very softly said, &#8220;Thank you, but if it&#8217;s that much, don&#8217;t even give me the numbers. I&#8217;m going to get rid of this no matter what I have to do, but at least when I do it myself it&#8217;s gonna be free.&#8221; She didn&#8217;t sound upset or angry, only quietly and absolutely determined. Then she said goodbye. And then, with my face in my hands, I cried.</blockquote>

<p>That young woman will likely appear in an emergency room somewhere in the Dallas area sometime within the next few days.  If she&#8217;s lucky, she&#8217;ll survive with no long-term harm.  This is no thanks to the so-called &#8220;pro-life&#8221; people, who are only &#8220;pro-life&#8221; when the individual hasn&#8217;t been born yet; after you&#8217;re born, they&#8217;ll happily condemn you to a lingering, miserable death.</p>

<p>In much of the United States, abortion is already inaccessible.  The days of the illegal, botched abortion are <b>here</b>.  We don&#8217;t have to wait for Alito to vote to overturn Roe v Wade, the <a href="http://www.operationrescue.org/" title="Culture of Death">Culture of Death</a> has already put abortion out of reach of those who most need it in large parts of the country.</p>

<p>Soon, this will once more be a common occurrence:<br /><br />
<center><img src="/Archives/gerri.jpg" /></center><br />
That was Gerri Santoro.  She died in 1964, when she was 28.  She was a mother of two and she bled to death from a botched abortion attempt.  <a href="http://www.lifeandlibertyforwomen.org/images/gerri/gerri.jpg">Read her story here.</a></p>

<p>The so-called &#8220;right-to-life&#8221; people want <b>more</b> Gerri Santoros.  And they&#8217;ll get them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Human Rights</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2006-01-29T21:21:32-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Doing my small part...</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000415.html</link>
      <description>&#8230;to defeat the attempts of a government to suppress inconvenient truth. Per &#8220;Calling All Bloggers: These Documents need publishing - Blairwatch,&#8221; I&#8217;m publishing the two documents in question here. They can be found here and here&#8230;.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">415@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;to defeat the attempts of a government to suppress inconvenient truth.  Per &#8220;<a title="Calling All Bloggers: These Documents need publishing - Blairwatch" href="http://www.blairwatch.co.uk/node/716">Calling All Bloggers: These Documents need publishing - Blairwatch</a>,&#8221; I&#8217;m publishing the two documents in question here.  They can be found <a href="/Archives/telegrams.pdf">here</a> and <a href="/Archives/npaper.jpg">here</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>International Law</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2005-12-29T16:47:33-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Cowardice.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000414.html</link>
      <description>&#8221; href=&#8221;http://tbogg.blogspot.com/2005/06/if-its-good-enough-for-dad-its-good.html&#8221;&gt;Via TBogg, I see that one of the Rabid Right, Don Surber, is claiming that &#8220;the left lost the war on terrorism.&#8221; Tbogg apparently left a comment asking when Don&#8217;s boys would be dropping out of Marshall and signing&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">414@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="TBogg<!--A daily dose of snark-->" href="http://tbogg.blogspot.com/2005/06/if-its-good-enough-for-dad-its-good.html">Via TBogg</a>, I see that one of the Rabid Right, Don Surber, is claiming that &#8220;<a title="How The Left Lost The War On Terrorism" href="http://donsurber.blogspot.com/2005/06/how-left-lost-war-on-terrorism.html#c111772081802126944">the left lost the war on terrorism</a>.&#8221;  Tbogg apparently left a comment asking</p>

<blockquote>when Don&#8217;s boys would be dropping out of Marshall and signing up for the New American Crusade.</blockquote>

<p>Surber deleted the comment and left another:</p>

<blockquote>Personal attacks will NOT be tolerated.
</blockquote>

<p>(And if you can see how Tbogg&#8217;s question was a &#8220;personal attack&#8221; then you must have had a few sips of the Koolaid yourself, I guess.)</p>

<p>So I toddled over there to ask a similar question, simply because I want to know the answer.  And what do I find on the commend popup but this:</p>

<blockquote><b> Comments on this blog are restricted to team members.</b><br /><br /> You&#8217;re currently logged in as Frank who is not a team member of this blog.</blockquote>

<p>Well, well, well.</p>

<p>Unfortunately I didn&#8217;t notice that until <i>after</i> I had written my comment, so I&#8217;ll reproduce it here.  What I wanted to write was this:</p>

<blockquote>Far be it from me to make a &#8220;personal attack,&#8221; even in response to the impersonal attacks in this weblog and comment thread (and, undoubtedly, the more personal ones that will follow this short-lived comment, sigh), but I do have a question.  A serious question.<br /><br />Sure, I opposed the invasion of Iraq and many other acts of the current administration.  Had I really believed, though, as you folks seem to, that the invasions of both Iraq and Afghanistan was the only way to ensure the safety of the United States, that the danger therefrom was immense and imminent (and had I been a couple of decades younger), I would have likely signed up.  &#8220;Done my duty,&#8221; as it were, just as many men did when Germany and Japan were threatening the safety of the US.<br /><br />So my question to you folks is this:  Are any of you planning on enlisting?  You claim that your cause is just, are you planning to support that cause?  Certainly the troops on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan could use the extra manpower.<br /><br />And if you&#8217;re not planning to enlist, why not?  Wouldn&#8217;t enlistment be the &#8220;moral&#8221; thing to do?<br /><br />Someone once said that talk is cheap.  Are your principles worth fighting for?  Are they worth dying for?  Or are they so much &#8220;cheap talk?&#8221;<br /><br />I know what I believe, but I really want to know what you folks have to say about this.</blockquote>

<p>But now I guess I know.  &#8220;Moral&#8221; or not, not only are they not planning to enlist, but if you ask them about it, they claim that the question is a &#8220;personal attack&#8221; and censor it.  (Tbogg&#8217;s comment was deleted, by the way.)  They can&#8217;t defend their position so they refuse to allow disagreement.  (Meanwhile some of those same folks regularly troll liberal weblogs, but that&#8217;s really pretty typical and unremarking right-wing hypocrisy.)</p>

<p>They are cowards to a man.  Talk is indeed cheap, and not only are they <i>all</i> talk, they&#8217;re even afraid to debate the issue.</p>

<p>Disgusting.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2005-06-02T21:17:11-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Heckling Ann Coulter.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000413.html</link>
      <description>Ajai Raj asked Ann Coulter a question in Austin the other day. He talks about it, and about being arrested afterwards, in &#8220;Poor Mojo Newswire: Ann Coulter Heckler Speaks Out!&#8221; The question he asked was crude, and used words that&#8230;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">413@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajai Raj asked Ann Coulter a question in Austin the other day.  He talks about it, and about being arrested afterwards, in &#8220;<a title="Poor Mojo Newswire: Ann Coulter Heckler Speaks Out!" href="http://www.poormojo.org/pmjadaily/archives/003161.html">Poor Mojo Newswire: Ann Coulter Heckler Speaks Out!</a>&#8221;  The question he asked was crude, and used words that are normally not used in such a setting:</p>

<blockquote>You say that you believe in the sanctity of marriage.  How do you feel about marriages where the man does nothing but fuck his wife up the ass?</blockquote>

<p>No, this wasn&#8217;t &#8220;lewd and offensive,&#8221; it was short, sweet and to the point.  Coulter was left speechless.  And that is point.  Coulter shut up, at least for a moment.</p>

<p>That slimy lying bitch spews her venom with every public breath she takes and no one calls her on it.  Well, the other day Ajai Raj did.  And he did it in the only way that works:  By spewing her venom right back at her.</p>

<p>One can only hope that he has started a trend.</p>

<p>UPDATE:  Er, that is <u>the</u> point.  Sigh.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2005-05-13T22:49:06-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>A little commentary.</title>
      <link>http://www.exit.com/blog/archives/frank/000412.html</link>
      <description>A Muslim site here has been &#8220;stealing&#8221; my bandwidth by sourcing an image from my site; This image. They are apparently a pretty radical anti-American site. While I sympathise in general with the downtrodden, their vitriol goes way too far&#8230;.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">412@http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Muslim site <a href="http://www.muslm.net/vb/showthread.php?s=ccafbbf692c2b195d9c8a10c81e3db20&threadid=127920">here</a>  has been &#8220;stealing&#8221; my bandwidth by sourcing an image from my site; <a href="http://www.exit.com/Archives/caskets/dover/casket09.jpg.save">This image</a>.  They are apparently a pretty radical anti-American site.  While I sympathise in general with the downtrodden, their vitriol goes way too far.</p>

<p>So I replaced that image.  With this:</p>

<center><img src="http://www.exit.com/Archives/caskets/dover/casket09.jpg" title="Commentary to a muslim site." border="0" alt="My commentary to a muslim site."/></center>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>War</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2005-05-10T12:47:19-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>